The Mortgage Debt Forgiveness Act of 2007 was once again extended and signed into law, during the waning hours of 2015. The major difference with the current extension is that it not only extended the tax break for homeowners who short sold their primary residence in 2015, but will also include short sales taking place in 2016.
New Attorney Positions Available
As the work continues to come in and the firm continues to grow, we are happy to announce we are seeking three new full-time attorneys to join our legal team. We seek attorneys who have distinguished themselves in their academic, professional, and personal pursuits, and who show promise for practicing law with the highest standards of professional competence and integrity. We offer a competitive salary, health benefits, and insurance programs. To view more information on the attorney positions below please click “The Firm” tab and select careers.
- Transactional Attorney
- Estate Planning & Probate Attorney
- Litigation Attorney
If you are interested in learning more about this position and feel you are qualified please, submit resume, references and cover letter to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Keep Your Custody Battle Out of the Classroom
In cases involving custody litigation, the court is always interested in the minor children’s education and ensuring that custody disputes do not negatively impact a child’s academic progress. Certainly information regarding the children’s attendance and grades is relevant in a custody proceeding. But what happens when custody litigants attempt to make their child’s teacher a witness in the case? Any attorney who has sent a subpoena to the school or the teacher has likely faced significant resistance. I recently interviewed Carlos McDade, general counsel for the Clark County School District, to discuss CCSD’s policies related to custody actions and the impact on students. The message CCSD wants parents, and their lawyers, to have is that while educators will always cooperate to give parents access to academic information concerning their child, they don’t want the child’s educators picking sides in a custody case. Issues regarding how custody conflicts impact the child’s educators arise in two primary contexts. First, during custody litigation, parents often want teachers or aides to give testimony in their custody case. A parent/litigant will ask a teacher or administrator to provide a written statement attesting to the parent’s merits or the adverse parent’s lack of merit or involvement with the student. According to McDade, these requests are problematic for multiple reasons. First, the mission of teachers is to teach, not to compose affidavits. Messy divorces can ultimately cost the District good teachers who don’t want the stress and hassle of becoming involved in the conflict. Worse yet, giving depositions and testifying in court take the teacher out of the classroom, which necessarily diminishes the quality of education for the students and requires the school to pay a substitute teacher. Of equal concern is the impact on the child of parents who put their son’s or daughter’s teacher in the middle of the dispute. School should be a safe place where the child can be free of the conflict between parents so he or she can focus on education and the related extracurricular activities offered at school. When the teacher is involved in Mom and Dad’s case, the classroom becomes the battle ground, and in the child’s eyes, the teacher represents Mom and Dad’s dispute. Both the child and the teacher, not to mention the teacher’s other students, are deprived of time and freedom from the stress of the conflict. Custody conflicts often continue between parents long after their litigation concludes. Once custody orders are issued, as family law attorneys know all too well, enforcing and interpreting those orders can be a challenge in high conflict cases. This is the second major issue which wreaks havoc on educators. Often, school administrators and teachers find themselves in the middle of these disputes. Parents disagree about who is permitted to pick up the child on specific school days. Parents disagree about whether a child can be removed from a school and re-enrolled in a different school, whether the child should repeat a grade, or whether the child can participate in a sport or take a school sponsored trip. McDade reports that each school, and the office of CCSD’s counsel, receives multiple calls daily from parents seeking to either report a violation of their custody orders or asking the child’s school and CCSD to enforce their custody order. The District’s policy requires the school’s administration to forward the relevant order to CCSD counsel who reviews the order and advises the administration as to interpretation of the order in question. CCSD legal counsel does not advise the parents, but they will speak to a parent’s attorney on these interpretation issues. McDade reports that many court orders are ambiguous, especially provisions concerning legal custody rights, which almost always equally empower the parents to obtain information and make decisions concerning the child’s education. CCSD will not interpret ambiguous decisions or serve as arbitrator where parents cannot agree on decisions concerning education. In other words, don’t send your clients to the school to resolve these disputes. If the parents cannot come to an agreement, they should proceed to court to seek specific orders regarding disputed issues, and the lawyers must ensure the orders obtained can easily be interpreted, abided by or complied with by the school and CCSD counsel. CCSD, with over 318,000 students, and over 40,000 employees, has just 10 attorneys on staff. Four of those attorneys, and their support staff, are consumed with the average five to 10 calls their office receives daily related to custody disputes. The message here is that practitioners, as a service to not only our clients but to our community and its children, must encourage reasonableness in their clients’ handling of education issues and draft clear, specific orders concerning decision-making and custodial schedules for litigants in high conflict custody cases.